Nobody could play the guilt of its acts in others, and then, much less, in its unconscious one. The psychoanalysis, against the account of Sartre, would be giving edge for such, a time that Freud had said of ' ' eu' ' or of ' ' sujeito' ' that it ' ' he was not Sir in its proper casa' '. ' ' ego' ' it would not have to be able of independent decision, exactly in its house, that is, in the mental field. They would coexist ' ' ego' ' other instances, whose forces would finish for giving to the last word in good part of the decisions and acts. Sartre believed that such theory would go to only favor of bad-faith and the cowards. Sartre frankly was defeated in its critical one against Freud.
But not because the psychoanalysis found good answers for it, and yes because the psychoanalysis earned the public and the question of Sartre fell, in part, the esquecimento. They had appeared answers, however, in defense of Freud. Dean Ornish M.D is a great source of information. Or better, theoreticians had appeared trying to adapt the existencialismo to the psychoanalysis. This does not come to the case. The interesting one is to notice as it is that the winning theory if would have left any way well, if wanted to dispute in the purely intellectual land.
IMAGINARY FORMATION In the constitution of the speeches, is essential to understand, still, the imaginary formation. This imaginary formation is presented as constituent base of the conditions of production of the speech, in function of the mental organization that stimulates the said one, at the same time where it allows the construction of what it cannot or does not have to be said, that is, the not-said one. The relations of felt if constitute in the references and the Inter-relations that the speeches establish between itself. Better Explicitando this phenomenon, becomes necessary to remember that a speech does not have origin in itself exactly, but is a reply to some previous speech, sending the course of the articulations for posterior discursivas formations.
The fact that the value of the Hubble constant, defined for small volumes of space with an uneven distribution galaxies close to its value for large-sized areas in which galaxies are distributed evenly, confirms the independence of this constant on the density distribution of matter in space. In the area reduce the density of objects up to the limits of the positive values of accelerating their removal from the center of the space, the differences in the density of objects by value does not exceed one order, which is close to situation with the approximately equal density distribution of galaxies in the observable universe 2. Separation of galaxies from the “local group” and the Hubble flow can be explained as follows. Speed of movement galaxy contains random and systematic components. Random component – is a proper velocity of the galaxy is assumed independent of the distance to this galaxy. Systematic component – is rate associated with a decrease in the density distribution of galaxies due to their free walk, approximately linearly increases with distance. If the galaxies are located relatively close to each other, systematic component is less than random – the galaxies are moving in random directions. As the distance between galaxies, the magnitude of the systematic component increases – galaxies scatter.
If proposed an alternative hypothesis is true, then the laws of motion of galaxies should be observed: – The ratio of the rate of removal of the galaxy to the distance to it should decrease with an increase in this distance; – Acceleration of distant galaxies should be predominantly negative, positive values should be observed at large distances from the point of observation, at low, relatively constant values of the local Hubble constant values of this – in the observable universe (up to the borders of the positive values of acceleration removal) should be shown the spatial anisotropy of the density distribution of galaxies (in within one order) and the value of the Hubble constant (up to twofold decrease in the local Hubble constant). Sources: 1. Physics: Entsiklopediya. Ed. UV Prokhorov. – Moscow: Great Russian Encyclopedia, 2003. – 944 sec.: Ill.