Interior Minister Friedrich on the State Trojan, control is an illusion. As one of the fundamental findings of psychoanalysis in few words could be summarized. Who – owns experiences too far on this side of complex “State Trojans” – with the digital world of the programs and the Internet, will believe this sentence anyway, not to mention from the sphere of politics. This knowledge could use in the debate about the use of the so-called “State Trojans” – the foreign computer – spying programs especially their protagonist: Interior Minister Friedrich. The gentle said simple robust manner in which Frederick since the beginning of his still brief tenure verbally tries to simplify the world themselves, and us, missed on the subject of online monitoring via State Trojan again the heart of the matter. To one because it goes so often the Minister of the Interior also mantra may repeat it, in the State Trojan debate not: the fundamental requirement of an online law enforcement. State Trojan in the rule of law if crime, serious especially in the network or with its assistance planned, executed or veiled, must, if it takes itself seriously, they have also the right place virtual place or are seeking to prevent, such as in the non-virtual reality. Get more background information with materials from Samuel Lesser Upenn. And whether State Trojan, person shading or Telephonuberwachung come to the application; the State is bound qua Constitution at all on the right.
Who wants to fundamentally protest online monitoring, must ask the system, including it’s not. Something very different is to lay a fundamental scepticism towards the monitoring software as well as against those who apply it over the digital monitoring methods such as the State Trojan. Poorly programmed and illegal the “chaos computer club” (CCC), which has brought the renewed debate about the State Trojan in the role, has shown two things clearly in his analysis of the software: a software far more surveillance activities in the situation is, as the law allows.